SDNY's Judge Scheindlin rules for Gucci in Guess lawsuit... on certain issues; small damages award, partial injunction follow
As reported by, inter alia, Reuters' Jonathan Stempel, Gucci has (sort of) prevailed in its three-year lawsuit against Guess over allegedly infringing efforts to "Gucci-fy" the latter's products.
LAW OF FASHION has posted Judge Shira Scheindlin's hundred-plus-page decision in the case here. A full analysis is forthcoming... promise. [UPDATE: This post has been revised in light of the Court's modified opinion, issued on June 18, 2012, which reduced the damages assessed but did not otherwise modify the previous decision.] Spoiler: the Court awards just a tiny fraction of the $120 mil requested by Gucci (along with a partial injunction, which -- to be fair -- is often the primary objective in trademark litigation) and concludes by stating that "with Gucci's entitlement to the relief noted above, it is [her] hope that this ugliness will be limited to the runway and shopping floor, rather than spilling over into the courts."
[This post is for entertainment and informational purposes only, and does not constitute legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship among any individuals or entities. Any views expressed in this post or at the linked web pages are those of the relevant writer(s) on a particular date, and should not necessarily be attributed to this writer, his law firm, its agents, or its clients. Neither LAW OF FASHION nor any person or entity associated with it can or will warrant the thoroughness or accuracy of the content here or at the linked sites.]