New article: "Fashion, Sexism, and the United States Federal Judiciary" (to be published in the July 2013 issue of Vestoj (UK))

Posted by Charles Colman

This short piece (which might serve as a springboard for a more in-depth article) is slated to run in the July October 2013 issue of the British publication Vestoj: The Journal of Sartorial Matters.  Here is the abstract/first paragraph of "Fashion, Sexism, and the United States Federal Judiciary":

 

The U.S. federal judiciary has frequently displayed a dismissive attitude toward "fashion," while simultaneously recognizing the great economic importance of clothing. As fashion was, from the formation of the United States until at least the late 1960s, associated primarily with the female sex, while judges during this time period were almost exclusively male, one naturally wonders whether the power dynamics of gender shaped the development of the law pertaining to fashion. There is good reason to believe that this has indeed been the case.

 

While I encourage you to buy the upcoming issue of Vestoj, you can download my article now at SSRN.

[Like everything on LAW OF FASHION, this post is for entertainment and informational purposes only, and does not constitute legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship among any individuals or entities. Any views expressed in this post or at the linked web pages are those of the relevant writer(s) on a particular date, and should not necessarily be attributed to Charles Colman, his law firm (or its agents, personnel, or clients), or New York University (or its subdivisions, faculty, staff, or students.) Neither the writer of this post nor LAW OF FASHION (or any person or entity associated with it) can or will warrant the thoroughness or accuracy of the content here or at the cited sources.]